Limbaugh: They’re All Obama Liberals Now

7 Responses to “Limbaugh: They’re All Obama Liberals Now”

  1. Cryin' for the Dyin' Reply May 25, 2010 at 9:57 am

    Hello..That whole thing is interesting..however I have not found a consistency in either party.  The name calling and cartoon-like application is staggering in many cases.  I have brought the whole thing back down to basics.  Hungry needs to be furnished before bullets.  I know there are a million clever answers..IE..’unless someone tries to steal your families food with a gun’ etc.  That is not what I mean.  I believe in the sanctity of home and structure.  I simply do not want to get lost in the false finesse of name calling politics..Peace Tony

  2. Lightfoot Letters Reply May 25, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    Did it ever occur to you that liberalism and socialism are like night and day? I do not expect much from the talking heads. But, “The Constitution is the highest law in the USA, not Congress, not the President, not the Supreme Court” would indicate an educated person. Especially, regarding the Constitution, Mills, Loke,  and Jefferson. You might consider adding another name to the mis-information merchants…..Limbaugh!

  3. Actually, true liberalism is being practiced by Libertarians, not those calling themselves “Liberal”.  Those today calling themselves “Liberal” have missed the meeting.  They are called “Progressives” once again.I’m sorry, I’m not going to accept your claim.  Please back up your claims with facts, proof, and defining your terms.  I am afraid I am not willing to take your word for it.  There’s too much B.S. and propaganda going around to where you do not get that luxury.The “liberalism/progressivism” practiced today are Marxist.  Don’t believe me?  All you have to do is read the Communist Manifesto.  Terms like “spreading the wealth”, “social fairness”, “workers of the world unite”, etc. etc. are all contained within that book.The simplest of definitions are one group wants a big government and the other wants a small one.  One thinks the people are too stupid to take care of themselves, so “top intellectuals” will govern and tell them how to live, and the other group thinks the individual is quite capable of taking care of themselves.There is one group that thinks the so-called “poor” can only be helped by forcibly taking away someone’s hard earned money and given to someone who did not earn it with government enforcement.  The other group believes you are entitled to keep what you earned and allowed to freely keep or spend it as you please, and believe charity is a personal choice and that those less fortunate need a hand up not a hand out.  In other words, help the poor by helping them learn how to take care of themselves and earn a living and give them the freedom to get out of their poverty with their own hard work, knowing the free food or shelter doesn’t last forever.You’ve inspired me.  My next post will be small, but just for you.

  4. I give you a lot of credit.  It is true that the parities have become similar.  That is not an accident by those that have caused it to be so, Progressives.  The old Democrat and Republican parties are gone.  We now have a single Progressive party with two branches.  The Party of John F. Kennedy is gone, and so is the Party of Ronald Reagan.What you are seeing are the Big Government Progressives ruining this nation.  There is something of a hold out in the Republican party, but the Democrat party no longer exists as it once was.  The Party of “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country” is now long gone.  The Republican party is undergoing the turmoil of the conservatives attempting to purge themselves of the Progressive infestation.The proper terms now days are mostly “Progressive” or “Conservative”.  Saying you’re Democrat or Republican has lost its meaning and distinction.

  5. Lightfoot Letters Reply May 27, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    First, I have never met a rank and file Democrat that called themselves a liberal. How many elected officials call themselves liberals. Only by the media. Limbaugh, NY Times etc.Second, you are right, Libertarians have adopted many core principles of liberalism as their own. Not unlike the socialists in the 1920’s tried to ursurp the name liberal. Also. not unlike the socialists the conservatives/Republicans try to ursurp the core principles of liberalism and call it their own.  Of course to do that both the socialists and conservatives have to destroy liberals like myself.Third, I’m sure Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity etc., know all this. They are just another group of partisan hacks with a political agenda. And, like the socialists, the Republicans, will also fail. It is hard to destroy hundreds  of years of history and thousands of associated years beginning with Yahweh.
     ” There is nothing liberal about these people.” (Democrats and the Left)  David Horowitz, Glenn Beck Show Sept. 4, 2009.

     ” Roosevelt is not a true liberal despite his words. What President Roosevelt is leading (New Deal) is not liberalism. If this sort of stuff is liberal, then George lll, Hitler, Stalin and Boss Tweed are liberals.   Roosevelt is attempting to form a new political party (Democrat) under a false banner of liberalism.”

    President Herbert Hoover – Sept. 29, 1938

      Last, I could give you a current definition of liberalism but, I doubt it would inform you or Limbaugh as to what you alresdy know.

  6. Cryin' for the Dyin' Reply May 27, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    Hello and Hooray for the has been under almost continual attack in one way or another..since I realized that everything has to do with two and politics..I truely am grateful for the ‘Bill of Rights’..I am truely distressed by laws that do nothing more than accentuate the lies presented by many in the name of violence or money..any type of oppression as long as it makes a profit..when confusion reigns prevalent in majority..I believe it is time to simplify to known truth..Peace Tony

  7. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, etc. don’t have a political agenda, and I find it funny people associate them with the politicians.  They have nothing to gain nor lose by having such.  Their job is to comment on another’s actions.  They are private citizens with no campaign, nor election to win or lose for themselves.  In fact, they have more to gain when those they disagree with are elected, as it gives them plenty to talk about.  These people are conservative, hence capitalists.  It is their business to talk on the radio and comment regardless of who is in office.To claim they are party hacks only proves you have never listened to them, except maybe carefully edited sound bites.  Limbaugh frequently bashes the Republicans for not sticking to conservative principles.  He also comments on how the uber-left have taken over the Democrat party and it’s not the party of your grandparents any more.Hannity, Levin (who calls Republicans Re-Pubic-ans) never has any love for any of the parties.  In fact, most of those radio talk show hosts speak of conservatism and its importance.  To claim they are party hacks only shows a complete lack of understanding of the business of talk radio.  They are private citizens.  They have worked long and hard to get to the pay rate they are in now, and none of it has resulted from anything a Republican or Democrat has said or done.  They don’t give or get money from any party.  You’ll find their finances are directed towards charities, not politics.Just because the likes of NBC, CBS, and such have become the media arm of the uber-left, doesn’t mean that’s how things work for Limbaugh and the rest.  They don’t need political hacks to tell them what to say and think.  They pretty much have minds of their own, and a love for the country as it was originally founded.You are correct on the matter of definitions of liberal, but that’s exactly why Progressives keep changing their names and names of everything.  It’s part of their playbook.  I call it “fluid B.S.”  You’ll also find that many that call themselves “liberal”, and yes, I have heard the term many many many times here in California, that do not even understand what the word actually means.  Their “liberal” is the alias for “Progressive”, yet another misnomer.  Progress never ever came from “progressive” policies and actions.  History has proven this time and time again.The name keeps changing over the centuries, and the authors of it in its various forms claimed theirs is a “new” idea, but all it ever has been is a group of people desiring to rule over the populace.  The reasons and excuses are irrelevant, as it never works anyway.  Some say they’re smarter and more intellectual and thus qualified to rule “better”.  Some say the populace is like cattle and must be reeled in and controlled.  Some say they are entitled to power and rule and that others are of a different class.  All are the same, and dead wrong.Man has never been more free and prosperous when living under a representative republic with the freedom to live as he deems fit for himself.  That ended about a hundred years ago, and now you see the last aspects of that being choked off by those desiring for power and control.  Their collective lie and excuse is always, and has historically been “for the less fortunate”, which is a lie.  Nowhere have the “less fortunate” prospered more than when they were free to do so.It’s simply understanding human nature.

Come on, you know you want to say something.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: